Patient group
Erwachsene, die eine prozedurale Sedierung benötigen
Added benefit not proven
Comparator
Individualisierte Therapie unter Auswahl von − Propofol − Midazolam − Dexmedetomidin
Prozedurale Sedierung
G-BA action
final resolution
2026-06-18
Evidence-checked summary
The G-BA found no proven added benefit for Erwachsene, die eine prozedurale Sedierung benötigen. The appropriate comparator was Individualisierte Therapie unter Auswahl von − Propofol − Midazolam − Dexmedetomidin. The G-BA issued a final resolution on 2026-06-18. The official page states that it took effect as follows: 18.06.2026. The page lists Arzneimittel-Richtlinie, Anlage XII: Nutzenbewertung nach § 35a SGB V as the normative target.
This is the latest validated public action attached to this case. It is separate from the IQWiG assessment result.
Final benefit result
Patient group
Erwachsene, die eine prozedurale Sedierung benötigen
Added benefit not proven
Comparator
Individualisierte Therapie unter Auswahl von − Propofol − Midazolam − Dexmedetomidin
Official case record
No inferred stages
Consultation record
2026-05-11
33 parsed turns
Oral hearing: Remimazolam (Prozedurale Sedierung)
Official Wortprotokoll · 9 pages
IQWiG comparison
IQWiG assessment findings and the later G-BA action are separate records. Open both to compare them.
A25-161
matched
Remimazolam (procedural sedation) – Benefit assessment according to §35a Social Code Book V
Official assessment PDF · 66 pages
G-BA decisions
2026-06-18
final resolution
The G-BA found no proven added benefit for Erwachsene, die eine prozedurale Sedierung benötigen. The appropriate comparator was Individualisierte Therapie unter Auswahl von − Propofol − Midazolam − Dexmedetomidin. The G-BA issued a final resolution on 2026-06-18. The official page states that it took effect as follows: 18.06.2026. The page lists Arzneimittel-Richtlinie, Anlage XII: Nutzenbewertung nach § 35a SGB V as the normative target.
2 official documents · 4 cited claims
Official sources